<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opeth Returns With Watershed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/</link>
	<description>online blogging killed the restroom graffiti industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MrAlmo</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>MrAlmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=172#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I have to agree. Those who say this is a bad album, are completely musically retarded. I find this album some of the very best Opeth have ever done. Just because the retards can&#039;t compare this album to the others of Opeth, it doesn&#039;t mean that it is a lame record, what&#039;s lame, are the retards who think that music shouldn&#039;t develop and change, that would have been the opposite of creativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I have to agree. Those who say this is a bad album, are completely musically retarded. I find this album some of the very best Opeth have ever done. Just because the retards can&#8217;t compare this album to the others of Opeth, it doesn&#8217;t mean that it is a lame record, what&#8217;s lame, are the retards who think that music shouldn&#8217;t develop and change, that would have been the opposite of creativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wrren</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>Wrren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=172#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>Anyone who says this album is bad is musically retarded. Complex time signatures, great vocals, incredible work with harmonic scales (giving it a very distinct atmosphere), secondary dominant fun ... and all around a shit ton of creativity. To say this is &quot;bad&quot; is to say you like to jack off to double pedals rampaging to open E. Which is boring. A+ record. They are doing an icnredible job advancing their sound and not just falling into the pit of shitty metal bands that exist. Diversity in a genre always brings out the best artists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who says this album is bad is musically retarded. Complex time signatures, great vocals, incredible work with harmonic scales (giving it a very distinct atmosphere), secondary dominant fun &#8230; and all around a shit ton of creativity. To say this is &#8220;bad&#8221; is to say you like to jack off to double pedals rampaging to open E. Which is boring. A+ record. They are doing an icnredible job advancing their sound and not just falling into the pit of shitty metal bands that exist. Diversity in a genre always brings out the best artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=172#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>I have to chuckle when I read musical opinions... in the case of Opeth, the badn I&#039;m easily most passionate about, each album is rated as the best of their work by some, the worst by others. My problem has always been that I am unable to decide on their &quot;best&quot; or &quot;worst&quot;.... but you know, it really doesn&#039;t matter. Take my word for it, &quot;Watershed&quot; is easily brilliant and unique, no matter how it stacks up aginst their other albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to chuckle when I read musical opinions&#8230; in the case of Opeth, the badn I&#8217;m easily most passionate about, each album is rated as the best of their work by some, the worst by others. My problem has always been that I am unable to decide on their &#8220;best&#8221; or &#8220;worst&#8221;&#8230;. but you know, it really doesn&#8217;t matter. Take my word for it, &#8220;Watershed&#8221; is easily brilliant and unique, no matter how it stacks up aginst their other albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillis</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>phillis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=172#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>this is one of those albums that grows on you. It shows the real depth of the band, that they aren&#039;t going to punch out the same sound album after album.It is  complicated and thought out. I respect any band that challenges their past material and pushes the boundaries. Holy Hell, wish i had 1/100th their talent.... ok maybe 1/5th ;-) give it a listen (more than once Socrates) and judge it on its own merit , not comparing it to other albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is one of those albums that grows on you. It shows the real depth of the band, that they aren&#8217;t going to punch out the same sound album after album.It is  complicated and thought out. I respect any band that challenges their past material and pushes the boundaries. Holy Hell, wish i had 1/100th their talent&#8230;. ok maybe 1/5th ;-) give it a listen (more than once Socrates) and judge it on its own merit , not comparing it to other albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=172#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>I really like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/reviews/2008/06/opeth-returns-with-watershed/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=172#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>This is definitely Opeth&#039;s worst album.  I&#039;ve been a fan for a long time now and was really looking forward to this album.  Unfortunately, it&#039;s just not very good.  I was very disappointed.  Hopefully this is just a bump in the road and not a sign of things to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is definitely Opeth&#8217;s worst album.  I&#8217;ve been a fan for a long time now and was really looking forward to this album.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s just not very good.  I was very disappointed.  Hopefully this is just a bump in the road and not a sign of things to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
