Editorials > Miscellaneous

To Perez, With Love

By Skwerl, July 11th, 2009
 

Warner Bros. records has given Perez Hilton his own label imprint, based on Perez’ somewhat trumped up claim that he’s a capable “marketing person” and “manager,” and he’s got “an ear” for marketable music. His early swooning over Lady Gaga and Mika are often cited as examples of his tastemaking, along with occasional phenomena such as the PS22 Chorus.

Perez Hilton

It would be easy to bank on Perez’ hateability and roll out a hit job here, citing artists he’s talked up that are either going nowhere fast (Natalie Portman’s Shaved Head, Dragonette, the return of Aqua), and/or just totally suck (The Pussycat Dolls, Robyn, Drake). And really, I don’t know that I’ve ever seen Perez go way out on a limb for a band noone else was talking about; I always just took him for a ticket-puncher at the gateway through which West Hollywood club darlings pass from the scene’s proving grounds into mainstream media. But this isn’t about Perez Hilton’s taste in music.

We’ve got mixed feelings about Perez. He’s a douche for sure, but we have a great deal of respect for the hard work he’s put into building his empire from the ground up. He believed in it… Or maybe he didn’t even think about it. Either way, he just did his thing. Day in, day out. He put 120% in, even when nobody gave a shit but him. He did it better than anyone else, and he made it to the top of a huge hill most people didn’t even know existed until he put his name on it.

We’ll give some credit to Warner Bros. on this one, because it’s not an entirely retarded idea. We don’t expect to like any of the bands he signs. We expect him to roll out the rainbow carpet for a bunch of crappy LMFAO type bands we don’t need. But there’s a ghost of a chance that Perez could lead a big step forward for the major label record industry. And we’d love to see him pull it off.

Unfortunately, the odds are stacked high against him. As Maura at Idolator suggested, you can’t expect an old-fashioned company like Warner not to demand that their properties get an exemption from their new partner’s trademark shameless shit-slinging. And even if Warner doesn’t explicitly demand it, you’d almost expect it to come naturally from a social climbing bandwagoner like Perez.

Recently, some chinks in Hilton’s armor have been exposed. By now most of you have probably heard about his public, caught-on-tape-by-TMZ fracas with the Black Eyed Peas. Perez dissed Fergie and the band’s new album, and Will.I.Am confronted Perez about it. Things got heated, Perez called Will a “faggot” (because he thought it somehow would be more insulting than “nigger,” apparently), and the Peas’ thug of a manager punched the blogger out. What I found most ridiculous was that Perez twittered for police intervention, compelling Will to join Twitter, his very first tweet being his rebuttal. But that’s yesterday’s story, and one we were fine steering clear of.

Then there was the Michael Jackson thing a few days later. When it was first reported that Jackson had suffered a heart attack, Perez fired off a characteristically disrespectful inquiry as to whether or not it was just a psychosomatic case of cold feet, with a demanding farewell tour looming on the horizon. Perez wasn’t alone- Roots drummer ?uestlove twittered the same thought, more or less. And I suspected it myself. But Perez broke the first rule of blog club: You never delete a post. The epic backpedal was meat on a spit for millions of Perez detractors everywhere.

It would be extremely naïve to speculate that either of these events could have instigated any significant downfall for the queen of some media, but it doesn’t take much more than a brief display of insecurity for the people to pull down your monuments when your fifteen minutes are up. And this deal with Warner could shake some sand out of that hourglass if Perez doesn’t play his cards right.

Perez Hilton needs to listen to his base now, and use his newly leased powers for their cause. If Perez can truly represent his people, he can redeem himself as their loyal champion, and Warner will stand by his Success (with a capital $). But if he gets sucked into the sarlacc pit Maura detected right around the corner, he’ll be outcast as a sellout; he’ll have officially gone “mainstream,” the kiss of death for the fad he will eventually be proven to have been, and Warner Bros. will not shed one tear. I don’t expect Warner- or any major label- to have that foresight, and respect the public’s bullshit detectors more than their own right to omnipotence over their domain. It will be up to Perez to save them from themselves.

Perez has said he wants to “shake up the music business,” that he would do it himself if he had to. But as misfit pundit Bob Lefsetz openly charged in an email blast yesterday, Perez is playing by deprecated twentieth century rules by getting in bed with Warner:

“[Hilton] could use some of that $72,000 a day advertisers pay to be on his site to break his own bands. And own everything. Emulate another gay hero, David Geffen. Do you really think if Geffen was starting out today he’d go into business with Edgar Bronfman, Jr. or Doug Morris? No way. Or, if he did, he’d want the lion’s share of the money. But that’s one of the things Geffen does best, sidle up to you, making you think he’s your best friend and then executing a lucrative deal. Perez is not famous for negotiating. He’s just famous!”

It’s too late for the most urgent advice we would have had for Perez. It would have been to stay away from the major label, CD sales driven business, and listen to your base, not to the delusional, deceptive seductions of an industry convinced it can push back the future with brute force. But now that he’s there, he needs to be strong, and refuse to ever trust Warner Bros. with the operation of the alien device they have just acquired. He needs to have faith in himself and prevail over the dark side, at precisely the moment where it’s harder than it’s ever been. But that’s the stage all of history’s greatest victories have played out on.

We’re pulling for you, you gay douchebag.

Photo by John W. MacDonald.

About Skwerl

Kevin "Skwerl" Cogill was taught his first computer programming language by his Mother's marijuana dealer at age ten. His first job involved hustling TicketMaster lines on behalf of a New Jersey concert ticket broker at age fourteen, followed by a job in graphic design shortly after graduating high school and trade school simultaneously in 1998. He built his first website in 1996 or so, and continues to do things the way they should be done, rather than the way everyone else does. He's a bit of an asshole, but he's fiercely loyal to fellow fans of good music.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, Skwerl now resides in Los Angeles.

Read all articles by Skwerl
 
 
12 Responses to “To Perez, With Love”
  1. EmperorWatcher said:

    Wow.. I actually read through a few paragraphs before I realized what inane drivel I was subjecting myself to. It first got obvious with the total miss on Natalie Portman’s Shaved Head. They’ve signed a record deal, got tagged by Lily Allen to open her US tour, opened for Duran Duran and draw sell-out crowds almost everywhere they go.. but hey, Skwerl (such CUTE spelling) has their number, right? Oh..and the perfectly cute, hip disclosure of hanging with his mom’s pot dealer is priceless. Putting down Prez and just about everybody else in the article (I didn’t read it all, but the flavor was getting pretty predictable early on.)might get you some mileage, but as they say “Your mileage may vary.” Indeed. Put it away dude. There’s probably a better gig for you SOMEWHERE.

  2. Skwerl said:

    yeah, obviously you didn’t read it all, moron.

  3. M. Green said:

    Good article, but unlike you guys, I cannot look past his/her/it’s douche factor to feel anything but disdain for this.

    I get your point about how this could be a sign for making some of the changes you’ve been advocating in the music business for a while, but in the end is too much to ask for this annoying sack of crap to die in a car fire?

  4. Evie said:

    Almost every UK pop act that he “introduces” on his website is taken wholesale from Popjustice.com. Minus GaGa and Katy Perry who a) have been willing to kiss his ass and b) whose labels have been unfortunately willing to throw a lot of money at him for promotion, he certainly owes Peter Robinson almost all of his success as a faux musical tastemaker. If Popjustice were to shut down tomorrow he would be lost since he has no original search skills for music or content of his own. At all.

  5. tng/dharma69 said:

    LMFAO…never heard of them. Not kidding. (and my ass is not fat) And that shows how deeply I delve into the world of things Perez Hilton-esque and its orbit. Best of luck to you Ms. Hilton but I think it’s safe to say that an epic fail is on the horizon and probably a self-induced one. Your resorting to pulling the whiney-bitch-victim card and the mental coin toss to choose the most get away with-able fucked thing to call a person is a testament to your (in)ability to navigate the terrain amongst the big dawgs without pissing on yourself.

  6. tng/dharma69 said:

    But hey…that’s just me.

  7. K.Ward said:

    I liked this article. I’ve never been terribly interested in Perez Hilton but even so this was interesting and well-written. The first poster is kind of a douche.

  8. Brian said:

    This was a brilliant read. The first response you got was from someone who sounds bitter and pathetic.
    Great article…I’m sure Perez would love to read this and I’ll make sure he does.

    Thanks!

  9. Lars said:

    This article is quite correct. Perez is not famous for discovering talent (besides his own) and it’s much easier to have someone pitch a few good songs your way than go out and try to find new talent. Most importantly, if Perez claims that he wants to shake up the music business, he better find some quality artists that have serious potential and can make a mark in the industry. Otherwise, he’s just another wannabe.

  10. Mike said:

    It’s interesting to read an article that didn’t immediately jump the hate bandwagon, but I think it’s a little bit weird that of all the internet ‘celebrities’ that you’d give a break, it’s Perez Hilton.
    Are you really suggesting that, if the music industry is to be saved, then it falls into the hands of a horrible man who has made exploitation and tittle-tattle his only reason to be famous?
    The fact that he has jumped into bed with Warner suggests that he’s only interested in his own gain. Why would a man, who like you say had the commitment and patience to build his website into something more than a repository for bitter opinions, then make the schoolboy mistake of jumping into bed with a major?

    I wouldn’t hold my breath, but congratulations for a balanced and refreshing article.

  11. Skwerl said:

    thanks for the kind words. my hopeful attitude has little to do with the fact that it’s perez hilton and more to do with the fact that the music industry is looking in a new place for answers. wouldn’t it be great if perez was successful, and labels started trusting other popular bloggers with imprints? not that we’re hoping to get one someday or anything, but there are people out there with great taste that are chomping at the bit to do everything they can to get truly good music heard, who are truly committed to helping to develop artists’ careers over time. in that sense, perez could be a trailblazer. i’m with you- the evidence doesn’t suggest he’s in it for the right reasons, or has what it takes. but we have to applaud the attempt.

  12. Erik said:

    One more reason to stay away from Warner Brothers.

Leave a Reply