<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Week In Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/</link>
	<description>online blogging killed the restroom graffiti industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:44:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Axl Still Hates The Shit Out Of Slash @ Antiquiet</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/#comment-27925</link>
		<dc:creator>Axl Still Hates The Shit Out Of Slash @ Antiquiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=15526#comment-27925</guid>
		<description>[...] situation sounds a little different than the conflicts that arose when Gwen Stefani and Courtney Love realized, only after signing rights away, that once a rock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] situation sounds a little different than the conflicts that arose when Gwen Stefani and Courtney Love realized, only after signing rights away, that once a rock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skwerl</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/#comment-15648</link>
		<dc:creator>Skwerl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=15526#comment-15648</guid>
		<description>hahaha... more like no boobs. and a front butt crack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha&#8230; more like no boobs. and a front butt crack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/#comment-15647</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=15526#comment-15647</guid>
		<description>Gwen Stefani most definitely has three boobs in that photo.  Not sure how I feel about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwen Stefani most definitely has three boobs in that photo.  Not sure how I feel about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Firecloud</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/#comment-15640</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Firecloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=15526#comment-15640</guid>
		<description>Did you really need to point that out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you really need to point that out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FernandoDANTE</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/#comment-15639</link>
		<dc:creator>FernandoDANTE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=15526#comment-15639</guid>
		<description>A bit ironic that the Beatles catalog is coming out digitally on an Apple USB device. Get it? APPLE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit ironic that the Beatles catalog is coming out digitally on an Apple USB device. Get it? APPLE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tng/dharma69</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2009/11/week-in-litigation/#comment-15635</link>
		<dc:creator>tng/dharma69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=15526#comment-15635</guid>
		<description>&quot;attempted weapon possession&quot;...that sounds so convoluted. Like either he&#039;s a convicted felon who&#039;s barred from ever owning a firearm (as per the state&#039;s law) and tried to possess one or he didn&#039;t have a permit to possess in that locality and tried to possess. Either way...really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;attempted weapon possession&#8221;&#8230;that sounds so convoluted. Like either he&#8217;s a convicted felon who&#8217;s barred from ever owning a firearm (as per the state&#8217;s law) and tried to possess one or he didn&#8217;t have a permit to possess in that locality and tried to possess. Either way&#8230;really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

