<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweens Gone Wild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/</link>
	<description>online blogging killed the restroom graffiti industry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>Googling? Look at the date on the article. It came out yesterday and was right on my news homepage. Not hard to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googling? Look at the date on the article. It came out yesterday and was right on my news homepage. Not hard to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>Oh, Mister Rose. It seems that you just surf the intertubes for keywords or something. 

Actually, he was at the shoot. I mean, there are fucking pictures of him and Miley together in Vanity Fair also shot by Annie. He says he wasn't at the shoot at that particular moment, though her publicists and handlers were still present. 

But again, that is neither here nor there as the issue is not Billy Ray. I am glad to see that you're googling little Miley, though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Mister Rose. It seems that you just surf the intertubes for keywords or something. </p>
<p>Actually, he was at the shoot. I mean, there are fucking pictures of him and Miley together in Vanity Fair also shot by Annie. He says he wasn&#8217;t at the shoot at that particular moment, though her publicists and handlers were still present. </p>
<p>But again, that is neither here nor there as the issue is not Billy Ray. I am glad to see that you&#8217;re googling little Miley, though <img src='http://www.antiquiet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Looks like some of you folks were wrong after all. Billy Ray was not at this photo shoot.

"Billy Ray Cyrus says he wasn't around when Annie Leibovitz photographed his 15-year-old daughter, Miley, wrapped in a sheet with her back exposed, for the June issue of Vanity Fair magazine. "I wasn't there at the time," the 46-year-old country star said in an interview Tuesday on NBC's "Today" show."

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080617/D91C1A7O3.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like some of you folks were wrong after all. Billy Ray was not at this photo shoot.</p>
<p>&#8220;Billy Ray Cyrus says he wasn&#8217;t around when Annie Leibovitz photographed his 15-year-old daughter, Miley, wrapped in a sheet with her back exposed, for the June issue of Vanity Fair magazine. &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t there at the time,&#8221; the 46-year-old country star said in an interview Tuesday on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Today&#8221; show.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080617/D91C1A7O3.html" rel="nofollow">http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080617/D91C1A7O3.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skwerl</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Skwerl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>haha that's disgusting. she's so obviously 15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha that&#8217;s disgusting. she&#8217;s so obviously 15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>As for real world results...  I never even remotely considered banging Hanna Montana until I saw these pics.

=P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for real world results&#8230;  I never even remotely considered banging Hanna Montana until I saw these pics.</p>
<p>=P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skwerl</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Skwerl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>i agree that it's a bad move exploring her sexuality in the public eye. but the extent to which she's being forced to apologize for it is extreme, and a lot to put on a 15 year old.
as michelle's mom said, she would rather have [michelle] look up to a real human being who makes mistakes than a fake corporate “product."
she made a mistake.
she's not a whore.

i made the rape comparison because, as you said, "of course a 15 year old isn’t going to understand the depth of depravity associated with the attention those images get..." so jackie putting all the blame on miley is as equally unfair as blaming a rape victim for being raped. if not moreso, assuming the rape victim is a well-experienced adult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that it&#8217;s a bad move exploring her sexuality in the public eye. but the extent to which she&#8217;s being forced to apologize for it is extreme, and a lot to put on a 15 year old.<br />
as michelle&#8217;s mom said, she would rather have [michelle] look up to a real human being who makes mistakes than a fake corporate “product.&#8221;<br />
she made a mistake.<br />
she&#8217;s not a whore.</p>
<p>i made the rape comparison because, as you said, &#8220;of course a 15 year old isn’t going to understand the depth of depravity associated with the attention those images get&#8230;&#8221; so jackie putting all the blame on miley is as equally unfair as blaming a rape victim for being raped. if not moreso, assuming the rape victim is a well-experienced adult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Firecloud</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Firecloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>"saying it’s miley’s fault that grown men are drooling over her is like telling a rape victim she was asking for it." 

I couldn't disagree more. Taking pics of herself in or showing her underwear, in sensual poses no less, is done with the intention of arousal, no? Of course a 15 year old isn't going to understand the depth of depravity associated with the attention those images get, but she's been in the public eye for too long to pass herself off as an unwitting, doe-eyed little precious moments doll. She likes her growing body, enjoys the empowerment, and wants to make boners. But she didn't enlist Annie Liebovitz to make that happen.

Men are drooling over her because there is a message being sent, and the Vanity Fair piece enhances that message. Who the fuck is drooling over Ashley Tisdale? Granted, she's a pointy-nosed troll, but if she pulled a Hudgens and put her furry crotch pics on display, she'd surely be getting a lot more attention. 

I'm not saying that was the Cyrus intention behind the VF shoot, cause that's fucking ridiculous. But if she's gonna make millions playing the part of the massively marketed tween role model, it's anything but harmless for her to explore her sudden sexual awareness in the public eye. I only hold her partly responsible - the real blame lies in the disposable pop star factory that clearly doesn't maintain quality control. The perfect example? Britney's a fucking nutjob who "needs help" - if you can call a shotgun help. That whole scene could've been prevented entirely, if only....wait, have I seriously devoted three paragraphs to this fucking topic already? Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;saying it’s miley’s fault that grown men are drooling over her is like telling a rape victim she was asking for it.&#8221; </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t disagree more. Taking pics of herself in or showing her underwear, in sensual poses no less, is done with the intention of arousal, no? Of course a 15 year old isn&#8217;t going to understand the depth of depravity associated with the attention those images get, but she&#8217;s been in the public eye for too long to pass herself off as an unwitting, doe-eyed little precious moments doll. She likes her growing body, enjoys the empowerment, and wants to make boners. But she didn&#8217;t enlist Annie Liebovitz to make that happen.</p>
<p>Men are drooling over her because there is a message being sent, and the Vanity Fair piece enhances that message. Who the fuck is drooling over Ashley Tisdale? Granted, she&#8217;s a pointy-nosed troll, but if she pulled a Hudgens and put her furry crotch pics on display, she&#8217;d surely be getting a lot more attention. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that was the Cyrus intention behind the VF shoot, cause that&#8217;s fucking ridiculous. But if she&#8217;s gonna make millions playing the part of the massively marketed tween role model, it&#8217;s anything but harmless for her to explore her sudden sexual awareness in the public eye. I only hold her partly responsible - the real blame lies in the disposable pop star factory that clearly doesn&#8217;t maintain quality control. The perfect example? Britney&#8217;s a fucking nutjob who &#8220;needs help&#8221; - if you can call a shotgun help. That whole scene could&#8217;ve been prevented entirely, if only&#8230;.wait, have I seriously devoted three paragraphs to this fucking topic already? Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skwerl</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Skwerl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>jesus christ jackie, shut the fuck up. she's a 15 year old girl exploring her sexuality. her judgment may have been less than sound, but the last thing anyone should do is crucify her for it, or pressure her into over-apologizing or feeling like a freak. they made britney hold press conferences telling everyone she was a virgin. you can't suppress the natural instincts of a teenager. it fucks them up.
saying it's miley's fault that grown men are drooling over her is like telling a rape victim she was asking for it. the last person that should bear that responsibility- the person least equipped to handle it and remain 'normal' after it- is miley.
it must have been a long time since you were 15...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jesus christ jackie, shut the fuck up. she&#8217;s a 15 year old girl exploring her sexuality. her judgment may have been less than sound, but the last thing anyone should do is crucify her for it, or pressure her into over-apologizing or feeling like a freak. they made britney hold press conferences telling everyone she was a virgin. you can&#8217;t suppress the natural instincts of a teenager. it fucks them up.<br />
saying it&#8217;s miley&#8217;s fault that grown men are drooling over her is like telling a rape victim she was asking for it. the last person that should bear that responsibility- the person least equipped to handle it and remain &#8216;normal&#8217; after it- is miley.<br />
it must have been a long time since you were 15&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>By the way.....anyone know what that bracelet represents???

It's a sex bracelet.  Check out more YouTube shots.  See, teenagers have all these little things going on that mean things amongst them.

If she hasn't had sex, she sure acts like she wants it and posing like that in an adult magazine will bring adult males looking at her the wrong way.  She is a child!  Teen age boys are posting nasty comments about her on the internet about her acting like a slut, a lesbian and her being hot.  That is what her pictures brought on.  That is all they were going to invite.  Now she has scandal and only herself to blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way&#8230;..anyone know what that bracelet represents???</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sex bracelet.  Check out more YouTube shots.  See, teenagers have all these little things going on that mean things amongst them.</p>
<p>If she hasn&#8217;t had sex, she sure acts like she wants it and posing like that in an adult magazine will bring adult males looking at her the wrong way.  She is a child!  Teen age boys are posting nasty comments about her on the internet about her acting like a slut, a lesbian and her being hot.  That is what her pictures brought on.  That is all they were going to invite.  Now she has scandal and only herself to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquiet.com/features/2008/05/tweens-gone-wild/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquiet.com/?p=70#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Michelle, does your mother know everything you are up to behind her back?

Does your mother think you should pose like her?

Yes, there are hoochies in school.  But this 15 year old has a fan base of 9-12 year olds and they are posing like her all over the internet so YES they do know how to use the net and I guarantee you their parents have NO clue what they are doing or are unfit parents with no supervision.

To see a 15 year old, or a 10 year old pose sexy is trouble....period.

Miley has more problems than the Vanity Fair pose.....she is acting a lot trashier in lots of other photos on the internet.  Showing her bra?  Indecent behavior!  Do you have any clue how many males are slobbering over that?  Is that acceptable to your mother?  Would your mother be ok knowing guys wanted to screw you because you were posing sexy on the internet?  

It's inappropriate and the photographer could have portrayed art in a way different manner rather than SEXUAL.  A 15 year old does not need to have fluffed hair like she had just had sex and be wrapped in a satin sheet portraying a sexual appearance.  There are plenty of other beautiful ideas out there.  

I guess it's ok that old men are already making comments about when she is legal for playboy.  15 years old and old men are drooling over her.....but.....she is inviting it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, does your mother know everything you are up to behind her back?</p>
<p>Does your mother think you should pose like her?</p>
<p>Yes, there are hoochies in school.  But this 15 year old has a fan base of 9-12 year olds and they are posing like her all over the internet so YES they do know how to use the net and I guarantee you their parents have NO clue what they are doing or are unfit parents with no supervision.</p>
<p>To see a 15 year old, or a 10 year old pose sexy is trouble&#8230;.period.</p>
<p>Miley has more problems than the Vanity Fair pose&#8230;..she is acting a lot trashier in lots of other photos on the internet.  Showing her bra?  Indecent behavior!  Do you have any clue how many males are slobbering over that?  Is that acceptable to your mother?  Would your mother be ok knowing guys wanted to screw you because you were posing sexy on the internet?  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s inappropriate and the photographer could have portrayed art in a way different manner rather than SEXUAL.  A 15 year old does not need to have fluffed hair like she had just had sex and be wrapped in a satin sheet portraying a sexual appearance.  There are plenty of other beautiful ideas out there.  </p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s ok that old men are already making comments about when she is legal for playboy.  15 years old and old men are drooling over her&#8230;..but&#8230;..she is inviting it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
