Sunday, February 7th 2010
Blogs, STFU: Miscellaneous
If You Think Rock Is Dead, Put Down Your Guitar And Get The Hell Out Of The Way
A reader named Aaron sent us a link to an editorial by Huffington Post contributing writer and aspiring singer-songwriter Nathan Harden – an article titled “The Generation That Killed Rock ‘n Roll”. I reluctantly ran through the ill-informed drivel that the opportunistic young artist poured onto the page, in his effort to convince us that we’re killing the very thing we love by downloading and sharing our music for free.
Aaron was curious as to our opinion on the piece, and I felt compelled to oblige. After all, we started this site to do more than slaughter the sacred cows; we’re bringing attention to music we believe in and raising awareness to the ever-changing landscape of the industry. And when hack amateurs with their heads up their asses spew fountains of false propaganda, we’re thankful to have a platform to counter it.
Mr. Harden opens his article with an immensely original assessment: “Ladies and gentlemen, you are witnessing the death of Rock and Roll,” supporting this daring new idea by rattling off declining album sales figures and pointing the finger at illegal downloading. He mourns the thinning numbers of music’s corporate tastemakers and trendsetters, the big business machines that built the superstars of generations past, while decrying any notion that the Dead Heroes of yesteryear would bother themselves with adapting to a new promotion model in music.
“Can you, even for a moment, imagine Janis Joplin pouring [sic] over HTML manuals, or Jimi Hendrix spending hours each day spamming potential fans on MySpace?” he asks, before answering it himself. “Not likely. Had those two tried to make it in today’s marketplace, we may never have even heard of them.”
Symbolic imagery aside, you can bet your ass that Hendrix and Joplin would be doing what every other talented unexposed act is doing now, if all the other absurd hypotheticals were in place to make their work relevant today. Their world was a very different one, but if they were around here and now, they’d be analyzing the changing landscape and focusing their attentions on the audience that’s going to have the greatest potential to get into them. And “spamming potential fans on MySpace” is anything but the way to handle yourself if you’re an artist trying to get recognized and respected.
Fuck your billboards, your bus benches, your MySpace blasts and MTV promos. When I see something with an MTV logo on it, I’m headed in the other direction. I’m clicking away from there. The tastemaker that once ruled the roost is now the leprous laughingstock, now more famous for its reinforcement of ugly stereotypes (Jersey Shore, Teen Mom, et al.) than anything remotely musical. The best promotion an artist can have is to get sent between appreciative listeners, to be on the stereo in somebody’s car or apartment, a button-pushing endorsement in front of their friends. No, I’m not talking about radio. Radio’s fucking dead, and has been long before Howard Stern left for less-censored pastures. It’s the human connection that matters now, and there’s not a single wacky morning DJ out there who grasps that concept.
“Winning new fans and staying connected to them requires tremendous marketing sophistication.”
This is entirely untrue. Amanda Palmer is the embodiment of what one person can do with a devoted vision and a little bit of creativity. She talks directly to her fans. She stays at their homes with her band when she tours, eats the food they make and provide. She’s able to do this because her fans respond to this woman pouring her everything into a song, a blog, a twitter account, a spontaneous webcam bedroom concert, drunk on wine in Vienna with a friend. She can be relied upon to never compromise, to always speak her mind and attack her demons with warpaint and banshee shrieks. Naked, honest and vulnerable – three of the most reviled concepts in any promotion scheme.
Amanda Palmer built her own brand. She’s surviving, if not thriving, on a basic, pure model. She does it because she walks the walk, and while Nathan “draws the line at downloading,” a thousand more talented acts with better songs are going to get heard and spread around because they weren’t so precious about their material. They pissed all over conventional wisdom, and knew that it’s inherently fucked up to insist on owning your money before you knew what you were buying. And a few of those acts, likely the ones that put in a little more time and effort into figuring out the best way to present themselves as well as developing a presence somewhere on the internet where people can find them, are going to go even further. But if you don’t want to have to learn what the hell Spotify is or how Twitter can help you, you’re not gonna cut it.
Stardom is manufactured, and it’s not measured by talent. Nobody over fourteen is under the impression that cookie-cutter stars Nickelback and Miley Cyrus are the pinnacle of musical achievement, but they’re international phenomenons with staggering sales and exposure. This simpleton argument that we’re killing this beautiful, universal essence by cutting Goliath off at the knees is, reliably, one of two things: either the desperate rantings of the fatcats and middlemen just beginning to feel the gears of this beautiful New Machine tearing into their flesh, or simply the reaction to the cold slap of reality when a hack artist realizes that they’re actually going to have to spill their blood and eat the dirt that comes with paying their dues and building their craft into something respectable, something people want to pay for.
The exception here is Susan Boyle, an unseasoned anomaly completely unfit for the public eye, but she defied every odd in the book. She became William Hung 2.0, and topped the Billboard charts in the process. The internet set fire to that woman with a hundred million clicks, and her resulting flame is strange and bright. But when she burns out, it’s not going to be pretty. She’s a lottery winner, and she’s bound to follow the pattern.
Bob Lefsetz is a brilliant analyst and philosopher on the industry, but he’s got Lady GaGa pegged wrong. She’s more than a lot of flashy distraction – she’s the new model of category-defying ubiquity, marching to her own tune, changing alien outfits a thousand times and engaging in outrageous theatrics onstage. That’s not her label, that’s her. She may be tied to Interscope, but it was through a mix of shock value, talent and brand-building that she’s amassed an army of followers. The tabloids can’t get enough of her, and she’s got the gay community in the palm of her hand – a very powerful demographic scrambling for a new hero now that Cher’s out of the picture and Madonna’s a veiny velociraptor without a shred of creativity left. Want proof? Look at her numbers. Nobody knew who GaGa was at the start of 2008. Less than two years later, she’s got 8 million albums sold, 35 million digital singles and counting and reference points all over the musical spectrum, at a time when the heartiest cash cows are hanging by their hooves in the slaughterhouse.
The internet isn’t killing record labels, it just gave everybody a place to collectively call bullshit, as well as to celebrate a flash-phenomenon during its short shelf life (like Pants on the Ground). Who says file sharing is the problem anyway? That’s bullshit. We’ve covered this already.
Greed, a lack of fresh ideas and stubborn reluctance to meet the rising tide of new media options are what’s killing the majors. As music lovers, students and collectors, we’re not going to ignore what we’ve seen behind the curtain and continue to subsidize the gluttonous unnecessaries that claimed to have our best interests at heart but only got fat on our gullible adherence to the hit cycles, the formulaic promotion schemes. It’s over.
“Consequently, our music is becoming less diverse.”
That’s the most rancid nugget atop the steaming fecal load that Harden’s HuffPost piece is. Whatever sand pile Nathan’s got his head stuck in must not have a good internet connection, because there’s an explosion of music happening right now that’s unlike anything we’ve ever seen before. Full-throttled boundary smashing experimentalism is happening everywhere you look.
Now the options are limitless. Down is the new up, and if your music sucks, or even if it’s great and you’ve got a half-cocked plan of action, you’re fucked in the long run. You think Adelita’s Way or Sick Puppies have what it takes to go the distance? Not a fucking chance.
If you think you can fool even some of the people all the time these days, you’ve got a rude awakening headed your way. There’s nobody out there willing to spend jaw-dropping amounts of money to get your music heard, and the ones that do will own you. So you’re going to have to do it yourself. But Nathan, instead of romanticizing about enslaving yourself to a label (giving nearly all revenue to a third party, abandoning creative control and ownership), you should really save yourself the hassle, frustration and wasted time and look into other career opportunities, like shilling for Pantene. Because your music is terrible.
Trent Reznor broke it down cleanly for artists setting sail in this new business climate:
Parter with a TopSpin or similar or build your own website, but what you NEED to do is this – give your music away as high-quality DRM-free MP3s. Collect people’s email info in exchange (which means having the infrastructure to do so) and start building your database of potential customers. Then, offer a variety of premium packages for sale and make them limited editions / scarce goods. Base the price and amount available on what you think you can sell. Make the packages special – make them by hand, sign them, make them unique, make them something YOU would want to have as a fan. Make a premium download available that includes high-resolution versions (for sale at a reasonable price) and include the download as something immediately available with any physical purchase. Sell T-shirts. Sell buttons, posters… whatever.
There’s plenty more to that rant, but the point is that any reluctance to dive in because you’re that precious and short-sighted about the product you’ve created and the climate you created it in is bound to leave you empty-handed, playing to empty bars in some shitty little town nobody’s ever heard of. If you’re lucky.
The Big Rock Star’s arc of success is much shorter, because there’s no end to the scrutiny available on the internet, not to mention the multitude of options. If YouTube were around when yesterday’s heroes were floundering, there’s a good chance they wouldn’t be what they are now. There’s no way to hide when your most telling moments are everywhere, on video, for everyone to see. Taylor Swift has had a meteoric rise, selling a bajillion records and winning all sorts of high-profile awards, but even America’s Sweetheart isn’t above the blind axe of evolution. Her Grammy performance was a devastating blow to the purest of images. Years ago, the rumors that she couldn’t actually sing would be largely dismissed as hype-countering sour grapes; nobody that huge could possibly be anything less than exactly what they’ve sold us, could they? But now, with infinite analysis options and qualified opinions piled high online, the heat is on. Miss Swift is going to have to deliver a powerful live performance with a lot of promotion to recover from her humiliatingly off-pitch Grammy performance.
Pearl Jam doesn’t have a label, and by scaling back their goals they succeeded beyond the model. They worked out their own distribution deal for their last album and they continue to sell out shows within minutes. Why? Because the music is good, for starters, but it’s so much more than that. They don’t bullshit their audience, and they go to bat for their fans in ways no other band ever has. But of equal importance is the fact that they adjusted to the shifting business paradigm. They initially took a lot of heat for making a deal with a big box retailer, but when the magnifying glasses came out it became clear that Pearl Jam was looking out for the little guy. In their semi-exclusive retail agreement with Target, the indie record stores were protected and permitted to sell Backspacer. After being tied to Sony for 18 years, they’ve adapted and are now making their own rules. Setting an example. Taking the initiative.
The middleman is an infection, the infestation that only sees in red and black. Harden believes we should mourn their demise. On his MySpace music page, under “label,” it says simply, “coming soon”. He’s apparently waiting for the suits to find him, to see the immense star-power value in his songs (none of which have cracked 1k plays), and snap up the prize that he is. What this misguided musician really seems to be mourning is the loss of his chances at getting his What Have U Done With America abomination on the air, of a label buying in and building some false mystique and hollow hype around his bad songs, the way it used to be done. It’s become next to impossible for Nathan and his peers in the foot bath of the talent pool to fool enough people to make it worthwhile anymore, to trick enough people into buying shit they don’t want.
You hear the remnants of it today when you turn on the radio and they’re still playing Smells Like Teen Spirit. They’re still playing that one song from 1996 that sold a lot of records, because that’s the model for how things used to work, and they’re going to ride that pony till it crumbles beneath them. It’s what they know. It’s all they know.
But Rock ‘n Roll is alive and well, despite the major labels drowning in their own deceit and excess while their hopeful cuckolds-in-waiting wring their hands and write ill-informed articles about why we should keep things the way they’ve always been. If you’re not celebrating the fall of the wretched empire, you’re a part of the problem. If you’re not hearing the genius, it’s because you’re not listening. Rather than crying over the loss of Sam Goody and Tower records, of downturning profits at top-heavy major labels, why not pay a little closer attention to the avenues that are suddenly thriving in this leveled playing field? MySpace and YouTube are the very tip of the iceberg when it comes to outlets for the explosion of great music exposure out there.
Embrace this beautiful, terrifying chaos. Listen closely. Dig deeper. It’s amazing what you’ll find when you let go of your flags and labels, when you cover your eyes to the gimmicks and promotional theatrics and uncover your ears. As with anything, the wastelands and unpleasantries far outweigh the beauty, but if you can find one great tree, there may be many in the surrounding forest to your liking. And if you do find one, respect it. Tell your friends. Go to their shows. Buy their T-shirt. Wear it.
It’s more than possible for bands to book their own shows, promote themselves, make their own music and sell it directly – it’s becoming the norm. The mainstream is becoming the freak show. As music addicts, fanatics and lovers, we’ve been given the most incredible gift imaginable. We’re the first generation to have the entirety of recorded musical history at our fingertips for reference, enlightenment, inspiration and education. We should be cherishing this rare opportunity to rewrite the script, to redesign the business model from the inside out.
But assholes like Nathan Harden are completely missing the point. If you think Rock ‘n Roll is dead, then put down your guitar, abandon your shitty failed MySpace page and dive into the nine-to-five, crybaby.












Click this.
http://www.myspace.com/mikerasimas
There’s beautiful irony in the fact that, not three minutes after publishing this piece, someone shows up to promote his horrible music. There’s no chance you had time to read the piece before posting, which makes you the perfect example of failure and the mascot for this editorial. Thanks buddy.
haha It was meant as a joke sort of. Sorry, I thought you would find it funny. And I did read the whole thing! Promise.
Impossible, but rock on then. There’s your plug. Peace.
Huffington Post sucks rat cock. Its commentators– especially Bob Cesca– are morons.
..And I’m mostly Democratic.
Is the shitty song at the bottom of the article from Nathan Harden?
THE NAIL OF THE HEAD. YOU JUST HIT IT.
Of course, I disagree with you on Lady Gaga. I think she’s just an attention whore who relies on shock to get the attention of the MTV kids. Talent? What talent? Her songs are fucking horrible, true abominations. All you gotta do is “cover your eyes to the gimmicks and promotional theatrics and uncover your ears”, and Lady Gaga falls flat on her ass. She’s like Alice Cooper, but much worse. “Oh, but she can sing, haven’t you seen that video on YouTube? She’s totall…”-SHUT UP. I don’t care if she can sing. Poker Face is one of he most awful songs of the past decade. She’s part of the problem.
So yeah, other than the Lady Gaga thing, this is an amazing article.
@Rory that “shitty song” is from The Company Band.
Have you seen this guys blog?
http://nathanharden.wordpress.com/
Not only is rocknroll dead to him, but also spiritual sex…or something like that.
Right on. Well said.
I was anticipating the response re: GaGa. She knows how to craft a hook – you can’t listen to Paparazzi, Poker Face or Bad Romance without acknowledging that – but like I said, she’ll be buoyed by the gay community for many years to come, unless she does something to seriously alienate them, like marry a very hetero guy.
Great work Firecloud.
I think people like this Nathan fella are in love with an idea that many of us had when we were growing up and many still do have, that somebody in a business suit would come swoop you up and make you a star. it’s such a quaint, cute idea now that it almost borders on homosexual.
But there are a lot of reasons to think like this guy does, and I used to also. There was a pretty bad dead spot in music after downloading but before youtube, etc where basically everyone was just collecting their favorite song catalog and then asked “what now?” For a little while the arteries that fed us music weren’t reaching us. Then new ones grew. The thing about a guy with 5 songs on a myspace page and 4500 plays is that everyone should tell him to give it up, though that itself is usually what drives talented people to really let their talent out and stop bullshitting.
But that was when you had to suffer through their band in person. Myspace has created a whole new set of problems because its easy to visit a page and be like “this sounds pretty good” and then be busy for all of his shows, which I would if i were a friend of Nathan’s, whose name is probably really Nathaniel with hair that pretty.
Excellent article. One potential typo I wanted to point out, only because it confuses one of the points you make. In the Pearl Jam paragraph, you say, “Indie record stores were not included in the exclusive retail agreement with Target.” I think you meant to say that they WERE included… or at least, everything I’ve read about the distribution deal indicates PJ included a set aside so local record stores could sell Backspacer.
Thanks for the heads up – you got what I was meaning to get across, but I’ll clarify a bit more.
This may sound kind of lame, but I added an excerpt of this article to my favorite quotes on my facebook. That’s just how awesome this is; I thought you should know.
Yeah, that bit confused me a lot too. How was it exclusive with Target if local stores could sell it too? I get it now.
when i read this moron’s drivel, it engulfed my soul in flames that would rage on until he was taken back behind the tool shed and put out of his misery, journalistically or otherwise. you’ve done a fine job of that, and have brought me peace and love.
so i hate to pick at one minor point and smear fecal matter over comments that are otherwise sure to be constructive (’cause our readers are cool like that), but i have to take issue with the taylor swift digression. i’m not going to defend her abilities, because they’re indefensible. but i think you and lefsetz et al. are making something out of nothing with the embarrassing grammies performance thing. it was horrible, and it was wrong, but it won’t affect her career one lick. she wasn’t made for television. it’s not where she belongs, and it’s not a place she needs to be (that’s why it was wrong). she’s there for little girls to listen to on their ipods in their bedrooms while they think about boys. that’s her massive audience. it’s not the people watching the fucking grammies. but there’s a huge difference between taylor swift and say, britney, that taylor deserves credit for, and that’s that she’s authentic. she’s one the world’s biggest pop stars, and yet she still writes her own songs, and when she gets up there, it’s really her singing. badly, yes, but it’s her (and it doesn’t matter anyway, because every girl in the crowd is singing along to every word even more, er, badly). everyone else uses auto-tune, lip synchs, poses out, but taylor is like 19 and can say “fuck you, i won’t.” i’m not saying we need to throw our money at every talentless retard that has heart regardless of artistic ability, but taylor knows what she is and has her shit together. she was never selling a great voice, her fans weren’t buying one, and the grammy performance didn’t affect her standing among the fans that bought all those records. only the people on the sidelines, who didn’t get it to begin with, and had nothing to do with her getting to where she is. taylor swift is to 14 year old girls today as the ramones were to 14 year old boys in 1978. they didn’t give half a fuck that they were only playing 2 chords.
also, fernando shouldn’t comment on pop or hip hop, because he has no points of reference for either. if he hates all of it, then he shouldn’t talk about any of it. with peace and love.
You make a good point, but her shelf-life for little girls’ ipods is two more years, at best. And what is this “peace and love” shit? You’ve said it twice. I’m beginning to suspect you of patchouli enemas.
P.S. Kevin – awesome. Links or it didn’t happen.
i was mocking myself with the second one.
also http://twitter.com/antiquiet/status/8827512446
great article, thanks for your thoughts. the bit that caught me was that artists must “brand” themselves/develop a presence on the internet. totally agree for an artist looking to share their music and get noticed; this remains the beauty of the DIY capabilities musicians have today. just a little worrisome is the inseparability of music and the internet, no? just the thought of not being able to have one without the other seems a little scary to me.. looks as if the medium already became the message.
you can do it without the internet. it just takes a lot longer. slayer and metallica built their careers on parking lot tape-trading that was just filesharing without modems. and at a much slower pace. and so basically, if you use the internet, chances are you don’t have the patience for a world without it.
i guess its more a question of the next generation of musicians/fans who will only experience music through the means of the internet. the way things seems to be going with music streaming and accessing music from the “cloud” so to speak as opposed to owning a physical album will no doubt have an impact on the way people listen to music and are affected by music. maybe ‘scary’ is a little paranoid; this, of course, COULD have positive implications, as music will no doubt be created differently as well
thanks skwerl – great article – bouns points for referencing Trent Reznor too.
Rock N’ Roll IS dead. Sorry, but giving your art away for free is pathetic. Art is not a commodity… it’s art. It has value. Money talks… when everybody has their own myspace page, your uniqueness doesn’t matter because you are a needle in a hay stack. You are a cog in the social(ist) networking machine that has killed as much as it has cultivated. I’m really happy with my 9 to 5 because it pays the bills – and it beats giving my art away for nothing and playing dive bars while people sit there drunk. Been there done that. And really, it’s all been done a ,1000 time over. There’s nothing left you can do with a guitar that’s new. I know the youth need their own music but too bad it’s all recycled crap from yesterday and they don’t even know it.
hey Matt,
Your opinion is just that. Your opinion. The truth of the matter is that there is nothing more permanent than change. Everything undergoes change. Even the way your food is grown will eventually change in the near future. Believe it. If it doesn’t… the world would not be able to feed itself sooner than later.
Same thing with the music industry. Just because you haven’t found the new magic formula that can make you the proverbial “rockstar” in these days of change, doesn’t mean the music is doomed.
Did you know the word for crisis in Chinese also means opportunity?
I guess different people think differently. In a time like this, people like you would rather get a 9-5 to start paying the bills. Giving up completely on their passion.
In a time like this people like me who already have a 9-5 and want a little more something out of life, will try to formulate new ways and new ideas to carve out a niche that they can thrive in.
With every problem… there is a solution. (and billions of dollars to the one who can come up with the best one)
Anybody heard of Steve Zuckerberg?
hahaha! make that mark zuckerberg, my bad. Does it matter? he’s 26 billion dollars richer than everyone else. He can deal with my mistake.
matt, good to know you’re contributing to society and not trying to make us buy art of yours that your heart obviously wouldn’t be in. wish you the best, sincerely.
trev, thanks, but johnny wrote this one :)
and as a sidenote, i was in an active, touring band for a few years. loved it. not once did i complain, even silently to myself, that we weren’t making more money. we were happy to make just enough to make it to the next town, and i only stopped because it’s not the life for me. if you want to be a musician, you can do it. i did it. if you want to be a successful, rich rock star, you’re going to have a tougher time. that industry, like many many others, isn’t what it was in the 80s. whole different game. only the sellouts and wannabes are crying about it.
Matt, You’re a fucking cog in your 9-5, man. If it’s only purpose is to pay the bills and allow you to whine because you GAVE UP on getting your “art” out there, then continue on with the 9-5 and spare us the whining. Maybe your problem was you CHOSE to play in dive bars. And then you CHOSE to quit. Yeah, the internet killed as much as it has cultivated. That’s what we call change: when one thing takes place of another. EVERYTHING changes, you can lead the change or you can work a 9-5 and whine about it while it happens all around you. MySpace is on it’s way out, any net savvy person knows MySpace is a piece of shit. Unless, of course, you WANT to be a needle in a pile of dog shit. EVERYTHING is recycled crap from yesterday, nobody has an original thought. Read Mark Twain’s “What Is Man?” essay to fully understand that concept( http://tinyurl.com/ye3fbzb ). The process of an artist is not to create from nothing, it’s to collect your experiences and outside influences and sculpt it into a product of exactly those. Giving your art away for free is pathetic? It’s only pathetic if people don’t want it even when you ARE giving it away. It’s pathetic if you don’t have the confidence that people would WANT to pay you once they see what you’ve got, and instead you try to sell it packaged tightly so no one knows what they got until their money’s gone. Really, I’m glad you figured out about your lack of confidence sooner than later, us “social(ists)” don’t need any wasted internet space. It’s an AMAZING feeling to WANT to give someone your money because they DESERVE IT. And a lot of people are damn willing. Maybe not today’s broke high school kids. But when they get their 9-5′s or are on their own successful artistic ventures, they will WANT to give their money to those other deserving artists, while you continue to whine about how “that darn socialist internets” ruined your chances of being a career musician. Have fun at work tomorrow.
—————————————
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Antiquiet for giving me this internet space to post my rants on for free.
Ryan, I hate to be the one to burst your big, youthful, idealistic, red balloon. I watched your very “artful” movie on your blog. After a regained conscientiousness from the seizure it induced, I decided to reply to your reply. Talk to me in a few years after the world has had it’s way with you. Being a starving artist is fun when you’re 20, not when you’re 30. You’ll be working for corporate America in no time and thanking God for your three weeks in Costa Rica and your weekends off. I know I am. ;-p
hey ryan, just to provide a counterpoint to matt’s, johnny and i both have our dream jobs, and support our families. and it’s really fun.
Um, what part of that was bursting my big red balloon? And see? Could you imagine if I made that and then EXPECTED people to pay for that? First, it’s an experimental school project. Second, the more eyes that see it the better. So thank you for your analysis: “artful”. I’d rather thank God that I can work every day of my life at something I love, than for the 40 hours every week at a job I hate so I can get 3 weeks in a country I didn’t want to go to in the first place. Anyway, you’ll know where to find me in a few years.
————————
I forgot to change that link, it’s a dead blog.
if you guys scroll down on the comments in nathan sissy-boy’s article, you’ll see a comment from a woman who calls herself “jredheadgirl” who agrees with the article and seems to be quite enamored with little nathan and his good hair.
i had to laugh because i realized that i know this girl, and that my band (regrettably)played a show with her band a few years back in LA.
while onstage she was all sullen and pouty and gave off the worst vibe to the audience (what few people there were) and at one point, while attempting to sell her cds, made some totally snooty bitchy comment about “all you people and your ipods” , basically implying we were all assholes for not buying cds…anyway, it was a while ago,so i don’t remember the exact quote but it was pretty horrible.
i do remember that her music was forgettable at best, and i remember feeling bad for her bandmates, as they were actually nice guys and decent players to boot.
my point is this:
1) people have been saying “rock is dead” for decades now – since the 70′s actually- and it was no more true then than it is now
2) the people who spend their time whining about it are, for lack of a nicer phrase , SPOILED LITTLE FUCKING BABIES who are in the music biz for ALL THE WRONG REASONS.
i have been playing music for close to 25 years now, and the one thing i learned a long time ago is that the act of making music is , in itself, it’s own reward.
you make music because it makes you happy, because you crave it and because you need to, that’s it!
this is true of any artform.
no, there’s nothing wrong with wanting to make a living doing it, but the minute you forget that golden rule, you are not being an artist, you are being a SPOILED LITTLE FUCKING BABY.
i have spent plenty of my own $$ making records while seeing very little profit, and i will continue to do so until i am dead.
why? because i need to play music and i love to make records.
it’s that simple.
if anything, the current climate of free content is helping to drive away all of the greedy money-grubbing music pimps out there, making more room for those of us that love it. and if it serves to drive away all the SPOILED LITTLE FUCKING BABIES, then i say fuck yeah, download your asses off, bitches !
thanks for listening… i hope that made sense.
Funny you mention her – I couldn’t believe she was defending the piece, so I dug a little deeper and found her music. Imagine Tom Morello’s vocal delivery through a woman, with high school poetry lyrics and a self-righteous defiance to her every breath. It sucks so very badly. But don’t take my word for it – listen to it yourself. I suggest “Dreaming In America”.
The real shame, I think, is that her voice has some potential to it.
Three weeks in Costa Rica, huh. Is it Toby from The Office?
Excellent article. A good friend of mine is a sales rep, and it’s made me realize that a lot of decent people are going to get fucked over when the industry goes belly up (and sadly, it probably won’t hurt the execs one bit), but honestly, the labels have no one but themselves to blame for the state of things right now. I still pay for most of the stuff I listen to it (and probably piss away a good hundred bucks per month on music), but the Internet’s given me a lot of avenues to explore that they can’t really compete with. There are a lot of bands (Kent, Skambankt, Thee Michelle Gun Elephant) I never would have gotten into without downloading—bands I couldn’t really support if I wanted to. Music has never been more readily accessible to people, and if anything, more people should be taking advantage of it. Matt, to a certain extent I sympathize with you. You’re right that if an artist excels at what they do they’ll usually want to be recognized for their talent, and possibly even make a livelihood out of it. On the other hand, you’re kind of a dick. So fuck you.
I read here a lot and I never post, but I have to say, well written man. You provide a strong argument for every claim you make. This dude is destroyed.
And on a side note, I had never heard of either Adelita’s Way or Sick Puppies and I was curious because I didn’t quite get the reference. I wish my ears had never heard that shit. fuckin’ lame, un-original hacks.
Second to last paragraph nails it, johnny. These are beautiful times, man, when I can find and enjoy pretty much any song I can think of,no matter how old or obscure, and plenty more I never even knew about. People should be grateful for the access to music the internet makes possible. I remember the dark ages all too well. I like it better now. We’re jolly green giants, walking the earth…with guns.
Impressive piece! I love your way with words ;)
Amen! But what do you expect from the huffingpaintpost? You know what’s funny, the industry whine about dropping sales but overall music sales continue to grow. 2.1% in 2009. Soundscan’s end of decade even reports that music sales were 800 million in 2000 but topped 1.5 billion in 2009. True album sales dropped, especially “new” album sales, but why focusing on that dying medium they miss the overall picture. I’d be bummed too if I focused on only cassette tape sales. And if they really want to bitch about dropping album sales, they only have themselves to blame. People will buy good albums, hell catalog and deep catalog album sales account for over half of all album sales, the problem is there are fewer good “new” albums to buy. But like you said the standout artists can still make it by adopting to the changing field of play. It’s the sea of mediocre ones that the major labels flood the market with that just don’t seem to inspire people to part with their money. That has nothing to do with downloading but supply and demand. Supply crap and there is no demand for it.
GODDAMN THAT WAS A GIGANTIC DICK UP NATHAN’S ASS!
Oh, and loved the passion Johnny had when THIS GIGANTIC DICK WENT UP POOR NATHAN’S ASS! Has anybody called that poor guy’s mother? I bet she’s worried she hasn’t seen her son this last couple of days.
Thanks for the support people! McKee – now imagine waking up every morning to find press releases for either or both bands in your inbox. I get several emails a week between Sick Puppies and Adelita’s Way alone, from labels and PR companies who’ve been promising me for months and months that these guys are about to be HUUUUGE. I’ve heard it all before. It’s bullshit, and I say so directly to the sender along with several reasons why, but information is a one-way street for them, and that’s why they’re failing. They’re not listening, they’re sticking to the exit-only plan come hell or high water.
On the other hand, take a band like Alfonzo. They’re a Scottish group trying to break here in the States, and in the initial blast I got they were being sold as something-something-meets Wolfmother. I patiently explained that not a goddamn soul anywhere will buy anything based on its comparison to Wolfmother, and after hearing out my logic the people actually changed their pitch-line to omit the unfortunate comparison. As a result, I felt a little better about doing a feature on them. Good band. Rockin blues style.
Skwerl and Johnny – Can I work with you?
if you’re wiling to work for free and help us stay on top of the news, contact us with writing samples. any kind of writing is ok, anything that involved you assembling words together to convey a point.
sweet
I don’t know what is sadder. The random e-mails from people with their shit PR to get you into their act like some old school shit hollywood pitch “it’s like diehard, but on a bus” or the fact that you realize these people are just street teamers doing it cause they want something lame like a cahnce at getting a t-shirt for it.
Nah, they’re not street-teamers usually, but chicks in their mid-twenties trying to rise up in the industry through a PR firm. The street-teamers know better than to bother us.
Definitely nailed this one Johnny. Talent will always come out on top, not selling records (or whining that you aren’t selling records). I think this Nathan guy also needs to learn about Gladwell’s 10,000 hour theory, because i guarantee he is nowhere close. Janis & Jimi probably hit that amount of hard work in their short careers than this Nathan fella will accumalate in his entire life.
Johnny – has this guy responded at all?? I’d love to know what he comes back with!
BTW . . . Alfonzo! Very nice Johnny!
Yeah, Alfonzo’s got some sauce. Their record is pretty strong and they could catch a good wave in the States. No response yet from Nathan, or any of his supporters, which honestly surprises me a little bit. Funny you mention Gladwell – I had referenced Outliers, but that was part of the 2k words that didn’t make it into the piece. Yes, believe it or not, this rant was almost twice as long before editing…
Good article, as usual.
I´m from Monterrey, Mexico. Im the editor of a e-magazine of rock, reading the article I can see that I didn´t choose the wrong way, I love music and I want to more people know what I hear, what I like and know the opinion of the people who read us. The article is great, and also the posts THIS IS THE WAY!!! We are the resurrection…
this is the site http://www.r-for-release.com/, check it and tell me…
I’m 31 years old and have been a touring musician all through my twenties, experienced some mild national attention (in canada, anyway) got signed to a label etc etc. at the end of the day the only thing that matters is what you’re putting out. if it’s shit, it’s shit….and you’ll have two shitty fans with soul patches and ponytails watching you at some shitty hotel bar in some shitty ski town. but, if it’s good and you’re willing to tour and don’t act like a delusional turd, you have something to build on. you have to be willing to keep building on it, and you have to realize that you’re never going to be Nirvana……ever. if you’re lucky, really lucky, maybe one day you could sit in the echelons of say, the Jesus Lizard. just don’t be surprised when you wake up one day and you’re a 41 year old alcoholic who used to be “that one guy in that band” who’s taking a graphic design course at the Buttfuck School of Applied Science and Horseshit. it’s not for everyone. be honest and kind. stop dressing like a fucking hipster cunt. rock and roll.
Glad to have read this, good stuff! Rock is not dead, you’re just lazy.
Did anybody else notice that the author said “Smells Like Teen Spirit” came out in 1996? That bothers me.
Great points Firecloud! I would like to add that if you have talent, with a little passion and work ethic you will make it in any market. If your music touches people they will reward you. Rock is far from dead; hopefully the corporate institutions that exploit it for profit are dying.
Thanks for sharing the post. Hope you can visit http://www.shunheng-garment.com. http://www.shunheng-garment.com for desired clothes including pique polo, polo shirts, t shirts, vest, jersey, lady dresses. pique polo. polo shirts.
Good morning, do you know where I should t
Haven’t been on in awhile, but I must say, I quite enjoyed reading this incredibly thorough, almost surgical, verbal rape of an article. That dude got fuckin’ TOLD! But seriously, fuck that guy. Agree with you completely for once, ya mad goddamn hippy genius you!
haha love you too fucker.
Rock will not, shall not, ever die. In the event of the Guitar Hero video game series, rock was revived, downloads of specific songs of the game series nearly skyrocketed. But since Guitar Hero turned into DJ Hero, we may once again see a slight fall. But rock will never die. People still have the passion to make REAL music with a Guitar, Drums, and a Microphone and playing it in perfect sync. It’s an art that will never die.
I know this is way after the fact, but I couldn’t believe this. I stumbled on Nathan’s website after reading this and saw where he posted that….get this….a college textbook publisher contacted him and wants to put his “Rock is dead” article in a textbook called Guide to College Reading!!!! Armageddon is upon us folks, get prepared.
Link: http://www.nathanharden.com (it’s not letting me link directly to the post, but it’s the third one from the top)
ya that’s right but we have searched for history of rock n roll, rock n roll guitar, rock and roll, is very informative good information keep putting up. Rock n Roll
I used to be suggested this web site by way of my cousin. I’m now not sure whether this publish is written via him as no one else understand such specified approximately my trouble. You’re amazing! Thanks!